A couple examples:

- We continue to insist that actualities are critical to newscasts.  But are they, really?  Soundbites from politicians, city officials, witnesses, et al, seldom add to the listener’s understanding of the story, and take up time that might be better used to deliver another item.  Remember, Paul Harvey never used sound.

-  Given what we’ve learned from PPM about listener tune-in, should every talk radio station in the market present news at the top and bottom?  How about, oh, say, 20and 5o?

- Is our story selection up to snuff?  How many stories still get done just because the anchor’s mind was strapped into a straightjacket by a journalism school teacher who hasn’t been in a radio station since 1979?  (Answer: Way too many.)

With radio in survival mode, it’s not realistic to expect the issue of newscast quality to get much industry-wide attention.  But listen to your own station’s newscasts over the next few days with fresh ears and I bet you hear at least a couple things that could use a re-think.

Doug McIntyre

Red Eye Radio host Doug McIntyre gets my nod for Most Insightful Speaker at this year’s Talkers New Media Seminar.  During a panel discussion about the challenges facing talk radio, McIntyre said:

“I’ve always thought of doing talk radio as an actor doing Shakespeare.  We all have the same words to work with, so the difference between a good performance and a bad performance is what the host brings to those words.”

How true.  Every host (general topic or sports) wakes up to the same pile of stories and issues.  The best hosts filter that material through the prism of their own worldview, life experience, emotion and talent.  The most intriguing prisms result in the most intriguing shows.

Too many hosts today are coasting on the content.  They focus on predictable story angles, take ridiculously obvious positions, crib from Rush and deliver shows no more compelling or thought-provoking than a political conversation with your neighbor the opinionated corporate accountant.

Some of these hosts probably just aren’t very interesting people — that’s going to happen when you keep cutting the budget line for “talent.”  Others maybe haven’t been coached on how to tap into their true selves.

Whatever the reason, we’re putting on too many weak performances in the talk radio theatre.

Newstalk 106-108

“Exclusive content podcasts allow the client to have exactly what they want, i.e. their own show,”  says Newstalk Sales Director  Cera Ward. “We tend not to give them full editorial control, however, they are happy their sports coverage will not be interrupted by any other topics, ads or promos.”

The podcasts are hosted by members of the Newstalk 106-108 sports staff along with prominent analysts from other media outlets.  Ward says the big-name commentators add credibility and boost client demand. The podcasts contain unique content that never airs on the radio station. The Heineken podcast was a preview of rugby’s Heineken Cup. The Ford podcast focused on soccer’s Champions League.

Does anybody listen?  Seems so.  According to Ward, Newstalk’s Champions League podcast is currently #2 overall on iTunes in Ireland — #1 in the sports category.

Key Point: These podcasts were not added-value.  They were sold as stand-alone products in a package that included a modest number of on-air promotional mentions. Another Key Point: Newstalk staffers get paid to produce the podcasts.

Ward says sports appears to be the most salable podcast content. She sees Ireland’s legal betting parlors as her next big prospect.  Podcasts, she explains, allow the oddsmakers sponsor sports content while avoiding the restrictions placed on their broadcast advertising by the Broadcast Authority of Ireland.

Give tremendous credit to Talkers publisher Michael Harrison. Despite the weak economy and radio’s on-going woes, this weekend’s event drew a sell-out crowd of syndicators, programmers, producers, hosts and aspiring hosts to New York City from as far away as the West Coast. Indeed, the crowd was so big that some events were shoulder-to-shoulder SRO.

The mood was… interesting.  I picked up notes of uncertainty, optimism, resignation, weariness, determination and a hint of sadness at the complete realization that the Old Ways truly are dead or dying; that radio has changed forever — for worse and maybe, one day, for better. In his opening remarks Harrison told the assembled that he’s not yet committed to a 2011 New Media Seminar. The day of the “big radio convention” may be over, he said.  And unlike last year’s event, where there was a lot of rah-rah about the Glorious Future awaiting audio content creators just around the corner on the Internet, this year’s attendees and speakers seemed a bit more subdued on that topic, acknowledging that it will likely be quite some time before there’s serious digital dough to be made.  Again, Harrison summed it up best, saying that Talk is in the middle of an uncertain voyage between its present and future.

There was a bit of good news about the near-term future.  A panel of PDs and consultants predicted a small increase in talk jobs in 2010.  Nobody thinks laid-off hosts will be re-hired in droves, but there are some new opportunities cropping up around the dial thanks to the current sport-radio boom and the rise of FM talk.  The syndicators say their ad sales are picking up nicely and most of the station-level folks reported that things are certainly better than they were just a few months ago.

As always, the best part of the NMS was the people; being reminded how many smart, funny, talented, caring men and women work in this business — both on-air and off.  I cherish every minute with them.  That’s why I stay up waaaay too late at these confabs.  If Michael Harrison takes a pass in 2011, maybe I’ll have the industry over to my house.  Hey, we’ve got a pool — and working air conditioning.

Michael’s list of forbidden words is designed to make WGN’s newscasts more conversational and PPM friendly.  Honestly, there isn’t much new here.  Anyone who worked in a Clear Channel talk radio newsroom during the Michaels-Gabe Hobbs era, knows this list by heart. (I certainly do.)

I give Michaels’ list my highest rating: Read It and Heed It.

Thanks to Tom Taylor at Taylor on Radio for the heads-up on this story.

Claire Byrne: Troublemaker

American broadcasters justifiably complain and fret about the FCC’s content regulation. But here’s a reminder that it could be worse.  A lot worse. Dublin-based  Newstalk 106-108 was recently censured by Ireland’s version of the FCC because morning co-host Claire Byrne called spinster singing sensation Susan Boyle “a freak” and “not right in the head.”   The Broadcasting Authority of Ireland called the comments “inherently offensive,” “disrespectful” and (my favorite) “not editorially supported.”

Newstalk was also found guilty of hosting a “one-sided” panel discussion on an issue related to Ireland’s role in the European Union.  While the station faces no fines or other immediate consequences as a result of the BAI censures, such actions no doubt have a chilling affect on the already mild version of talk radio practiced on the Emerald Isle.

On the flip side, a Newstalk guest recently let loose a full-throated “Bullshit!” in the middle of the broadcast day, and I’m told that incident will likely bring no grief to the station.

So, they have that going for them.

The Daily Beast

Daily Beast writer Samuel P. Jacobs consulted with Talkers publisher Michael Harrison and unnamed “national radio hosts” to compile the list.  I love me some Michael Harrison, and I have great respect for every host on the list, but, umm, well…  take a look and see what you think.

According to Young’s opinion piece at Philly.com, Air America and most other liberal talkers have copied the pedantic, almost authoritarian style of conservative talk radio — a style that doesn’t appeal to the liberal audience.  As Young writes:

“[T]he crux of liberal talk’s inability to match up to right-wing talk isn’t the business plan or the lack of a Limbaugh. It’s a failure to understand its audience… Before Limbaugh, talk radio was about wanting to know what you think. Today, it’s telling you what you should think. The liberal audience doesn’t work that way; reaching a consensus on the left is like herding cats.

Wouldn’t it make sense to go to your strength, not try to mimic your opponent’s? The left needs to pay attention to the success of Comedy Central’s one-two punch of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. They don’t necessarily reach the numbers of Limbaugh, Beck, or Sean Hannity, but they have cornered the market on political satire, and there’s no denying their influence.”

Of course, comedy isn’t the only way to reach a liberal audience.  Young fails to mention the one radio network that enjoys great success with a style that owes nothing to Rush, Glenn or Sean.  It’s called National Public Radio.

Dems need to get in there and fight

Boston Phoenix blogger Adam Reilly offers an insightful post-mortem on talk radio’s role in Scott Brown’s election to the U.S. Senate. The bottom-line: Relationships and engagement matter — a lot.

True, most Beantown talkers were ideologically pre-disposed to support the Republican Brown.  But Brown also benefited tremendously from his long-time courtship of  the radio crowd.  Even before the U.S. Senate campaign, then-State Senator Brown would often call local shows unannounced just to share an opinion or bit of news. Conversely, Democrat Martha Coakley’s campaign typically didn’t even bother to return calls from shows they deemed hostile.  The result: hosts who were inclined to disagree with Coakley came to dislike her. (Coakley is not unique in this attitude.  I’ve seen it many times, including at WMAL/Washington, where we were never able to get Democratic candidate/Congressman Chris Van Hollen (MD-8) on the air — not even with our easy-going morning guys.

The lesson Reilly offers is the same one we learned in the climactic scene of Top Gun: You can’t win the dogfight unless you overcome your anxiety and engage your opponent.  Of course, you need the skills necessary to mix it up with a professional talker, but most hosts aren’t that daunting.

While a liberal politician may not “win” every talk radio encounter, their very appearance can help blunt the harshness of future criticism.  As WTKK-FM/Boston personality and former political activist Jim Braude observes in the Phoenix post: “Democrats should start dialing. Most if not all conservative talk-show hosts are paper tigers. It’s also hard for any human to completely eviscerate someone who talks to them, and most talk-show hosts are human. And in my experience, after I called a show, I’d get e-mails saying, ‘You know, I hate everything you stand for — but I gotta give you credit for having the courage to come on.’