<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; PPM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talkfrontier.com/tag/ppm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talkfrontier.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Radio News Due for an Overhaul?</title>
		<link>http://www.talkfrontier.com/2010/03/27/is-radio-news-due-for-an-overhaul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talkfrontier.com/2010/03/27/is-radio-news-due-for-an-overhaul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randall Bloomquist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programming Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers.Michael Kinsley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkfrontier.com/?p=1440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Michael Kinsley critique of newspaper writing will be fascinating to anyone with a passion for news.  Kinsley&#8217;s argument that the prints desperately need  to update their presentation of the news has me wondering: When was the last time we seriously thought about whether radio news is truly serving the wants/needs of today&#8217;s listeners?
A couple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.talkfrontier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/newspapers1.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1446" title="newspapers1" src="http://www.talkfrontier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/newspapers1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></em>This <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/01/cut-this-story/7823/"><strong>Michael Kinsley</strong> critique of newspaper writing</a> will be fascinating to anyone with a passion for news.  Kinsley&#8217;s argument that the prints desperately need  to update their presentation of the news has me wondering: When was the last time we seriously thought about whether radio news is truly serving the wants/needs of today&#8217;s listeners?</p>
<p>A couple examples:</p>
<p>- We continue to insist that actualities are critical to newscasts.  But are they, really?  Soundbites from politicians, city officials, witnesses, et al, seldom add to the listener&#8217;s understanding of the story, and take up time that might be better used to deliver another item.  Remember, <strong>Paul Harvey</strong> never used sound.</p>
<p>-  Given what we&#8217;ve learned from PPM about listener tune-in, should every talk radio station in the market present news at the top and bottom?  How about, oh, say, 20and 5o?</p>
<p>- Is our story selection up to snuff?  How many stories still get done just because the anchor&#8217;s mind was strapped into a straightjacket by a journalism school teacher who hasn&#8217;t been in a radio station since 1979?  (Answer: Way too many.)</p>
<p>With radio in survival mode, it&#8217;s not realistic to expect the issue of newscast quality to get much industry-wide attention.  But listen to your own station&#8217;s newscasts over the next few days with fresh ears and I bet you hear at least a couple things that could use a re-think.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkfrontier.com%2F2010%2F03%2F27%2Fis-radio-news-due-for-an-overhaul%2F&amp;linkname=Is%20Radio%20News%20Due%20for%20an%20Overhaul%3F"><img src="http://www.talkfrontier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talkfrontier.com/2010/03/27/is-radio-news-due-for-an-overhaul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Callers: PPM&#8217;s Next Victim?</title>
		<link>http://www.talkfrontier.com/2010/01/11/callers-ppms-next-victim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talkfrontier.com/2010/01/11/callers-ppms-next-victim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randall Bloomquist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programming Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob McCown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[callers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports talk radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TheFan590]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkfrontier.com/?p=1124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent column in Toronto&#8217;s Globe and Mail reports that Canadian sports-talk stations have developed a serious bias against callers, with some shows banning them all together, and others limiting listener participation to special &#8220;hot-button topic&#8221; segments or post-game shows.
The most eyebrow-raising observation in the column comes from Bob McCown, host of an afternoon drive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1126" title="caller" src="http://www.talkfrontier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/caller-150x150.jpg" alt="caller" width="150" height="150" />A r<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/is-roccofrom-woodbridgea-dying-breed/article1421101/">ecent column in Toronto&#8217;s <em>Globe and Mail</em> </a>reports that Canadian sports-talk stations have developed a serious bias against callers, with some shows banning them all together, and others limiting listener participation to special &#8220;hot-button topic&#8221; segments or post-game shows.</p>
<p>The most eyebrow-raising observation in the column comes from <strong><a href="http://www.fan590.com/onair/more.jsp?content=20080123_183436_4280">Bob McCown</a></strong>, host of an afternoon drive show on Toronto&#8217;s<a href="http://www.thefan590.com"> </a><strong><a href="http://www.fan590.com">The Fan590</a></strong><a href="http://www.fan590.com">.</a> McCown, who recently reduced the number of calls in what used to be his only caller-driven hour, says he will use PPM data to determine whether or not to continue taking with his listeners.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m not aware of any significant PPM research on caller segments, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to hear that they score poorly.  Too many bad calls still get on the air at talk stations &#8212; meandering, repetitive, boring, static-plagued calls that make listeners punch-out long before the call is over.  That said, it would be a big mistake for programmers or hosts to issue broad &#8220;no-caller&#8221; dictates.  When properly managed, callers are a powerful show element that can help a host shine and bring a program to life.  Here are some things to remember about calls:</p>
<p><strong>Shows get the calls they deserve.</strong> An informed, entertaining host gets informed entertaining calls. And vice versa.</p>
<p><strong>Call screeners are crucial.</strong> An assertive, well-trained call screener is like an offensive line for the host.  She opens holes to advance the show and keeps the host from getting sacked by a bad caller.  That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s a tragedy that so many stations have combined the board operator and call screener jobs.</p>
<p><strong>Ignore your mother. </strong> Too many hosts treat callers with the telephone etiquette they learned as kids &#8212; exchanging pleasantries, listening without interrupting, and offering every caller a fond farewell.  Most of this is an unnecessary disservice to the listeners. Hit it and quit it.</p>
<p>An aside: Based on nothing but personal observation, I believe sports-talk gets better calls than news-talk.  I suspect this is because sports is the Toy Department of life; the callers are passionate, but they are ultimately talking about entertainment.  Conversely, too many news-talk callers seem to think their call makes them part of a life-and-death Battle for America&#8217;s Future.  Plus, sports-talk guys seem to get  more calls from listeners who disagree with them, which adds a new dimension to the conversation, especially when the host actually engages with the caller instead of blowing them off.</p>
<p>More on that later.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkfrontier.com%2F2010%2F01%2F11%2Fcallers-ppms-next-victim%2F&amp;linkname=Callers%3A%20PPM%26%238217%3Bs%20Next%20Victim%3F"><img src="http://www.talkfrontier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talkfrontier.com/2010/01/11/callers-ppms-next-victim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debuting in the # 1 spot &#8212; it&#8217;s Boston&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.talkfrontier.com/2009/04/25/debuting-in-the-1-spot-its-boston/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talkfrontier.com/2009/04/25/debuting-in-the-1-spot-its-boston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randall Bloomquist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WBZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkfrontier.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope, not the band, the market.  Inside Radio&#8217;s Mike Kinosian reports that with its first monthly report, Boston becomes the #1 PPM market for Talk listening.  Kinosian adds the footnote that the Boston Talk number includes WBZ-AM, a true news/talk hybrid.  But it&#8217;s no surprise that Boston is rockin&#8217; the chart &#8211; Beantown has always been a great [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-193" title="boston" src="http://www.talkfrontier.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/boston.jpeg" alt="boston" width="119" height="118" />Nope, not the band, the market.  <a title="Inside Radio" href="http://ftp.media.radcity.net/ZMST/daily/ITNAPR242009.pdf">Inside Radio&#8217;s </a>Mike Kinosian reports that with its first monthly report, Boston becomes the #1 PPM market for Talk listening.  Kinosian adds the footnote that the Boston Talk number includes <a title="WBZ website" href="http://www.wbz.com">WBZ-AM</a>, a true news/talk hybrid.  But it&#8217;s no surprise that Boston is rockin&#8217; the chart &#8211; Beantown has always been a great market for Talk.  Why?  It&#8217;s still the town that gave America hot-headed Samuel Adams and erudite (and hot-headed) John Adams.  Boston is a  city of smart, opinionated, emotional people who aren&#8217;t afraid to tell you exactly what they think and where you can stick it.  What better audience for a talk show?</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkfrontier.com%2F2009%2F04%2F25%2Fdebuting-in-the-1-spot-its-boston%2F&amp;linkname=Debuting%20in%20the%20%23%201%20spot%20%26%238212%3B%20it%26%238217%3Bs%20Boston%26%238230%3B"><img src="http://www.talkfrontier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talkfrontier.com/2009/04/25/debuting-in-the-1-spot-its-boston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
